Experts Say // Intro pt.1
In history there is a pattern to withhold knowledge from the masses. The Papacy had its hand firmly griped around the common folk, with a dominance unlike anything felt before. This era of suppressed information is labeled the Dark Ages. The Pope had immense help and financial backing with the banking family - Medici. Since the removal of the 45th president from Twitter, again the same pattern emerges. misinformation and cancelation will become your fate and you'll be forever blackballed from the metaverse.
Let's look at why were the Dark Ages so dark? The darkness is from the rise of superstition and the burning of anyone associated with magic or science. Witches, Pagens, and other heretics often found their selves as ash heaps of flesh. Intellectuals and those who practiced the dark arts, had to take their curiosity and manuscripts of alchemy underground. They formed secret societies and other sects, to battle those who were persecuting them. The most notable of these curious souls, were the - Freemasons (Knights Templars). You can read on this battle for knowledge or light in the books: Dungeon, Fire and Sword and Born in Blood, both by John J. Robinson.
Eric Hoffer the great American philosopher wrote about the modern intellectuals in his book: The Ordeal of Change
"It is chiefly to these pseudo-intellectuals that Communist Russia directs its appeal. It brings them the promise of membership in a ruling elite, the prospect of having a hand in the historical process, and, by its doctrinaire double-talk, provides them with a sense of weight and depth...In almost every civilization we know of, in Europe too, up to the end of the Middle Ages, the equivalent of the intellectual was either a member of a ruling elite or closely allied with it...during the Middle Ages, most of the educated people were of the clergy (Roman Catholic) and hence members of an elite. But the fifteenth century, which saw the emergence of the modern Occident (West), also saw a fateful change in the status of the European intellectual. The catastrophic events of the fourteenth century - The Black Death, which killed off a large part of the population and nearly half of the clergy, and the divisions and disorders of the Papacy - weakened the hold of the Catholic Church on the European masses. This in conjunction with the introduction of paper and printing made it possible for education to escape the control of an all-embracing Church. There emerged a large group of non-clerical teachers, students, scholars, and writers who were not members of a clearly marked privileged class, and who's social usefulness was not self-evident. In the modern Occident power was, and still is, the prerogative of men of action - landowners, soldiers, businessmen, industrialist, and their hangers-on. The intellectual is treated as a poor relation and has to pick up the crumbs. He usually ekes out a living by teaching, journalism, or some white-collar job. Even when his excellence, as a writer, artist, scientist, or educator is generally recognized and rewarded, he does not feel himself one of the elites. The intellectuals passionate search for an acknowledge status and a role of social usefulness has been a ferment in the Occident since the days of the Renaissance. He has pioneered every upheaval from the Reformation to the latest nationalist or socialist movement. Yet the intellectual has not known how to retain a position of leadership in the movements and new regimes he has done so much to initiate and promote. He has usually been elbowed out by fanatics and practical men of action. This has been particularly so in the case of the nationalist movement which have pullulated all over the Occident during the past hundred years...Now, although the homelessness of the intellectual is more or less evident in all Western and Westernized societies, it is nowhere so pronounced as in our own common-man civilization. America has been running its complex economy and governmental machinery and has been satisfying most of its cultural needs without the aid of the typical intellectual. Nowhere has the intellectual so little say in the management of affairs. it is natural, therefore, that the intellectuals outside the United States should see in the spread of Americanization a threat not only to their influence but to their very existence...The Communist have always had an acute awareness of the fateful relations between the intellectual and the established order. They are convinced, in the words of Stalin: No ruling class has managed without its own intelligentsia" pg. 11-17)
Hoffer wrote this in the early 1960's, during the era of the Space-Race. Obviously, things have changed in America, after the eight Obama years and our drastic shift into Socialism, we now progress towards Communism and eventually a Totalitarian-Technocracy. None the less - Hoffer shows the contrast between blue-collar and white-collar and between the average working person and the TPTB(the Powers that Be). How can the intellectual with no money and no family name, rise above all other commoners and eat the scraps that fall from the TPTB tables? This presents a thought, just like the pyramidal structure of secret societies, to reach the top one must earn degrees, now fast forward in modern times we have the same systems but more in the open. You have to strive to enter-in the establishment of TPTB.
With carful study one can find that throughout all history TPTB have surrounded themselves with - experts. In communist Eastern Europe, this elite caste was the: Nomenklatura, think of the Nomenklatura as made up of individuals like the character O'Brien in the book: 1984, O'Brien's allegiance is derived from his ultimate passion for the Party and its ideas. Thus, Orwell shows that curiosity of the mind can be disturbingly inherent human characteristic and can rupture common human traits if used for personal gain. An individual may corrupt his morals in order to achieve greater authority. Modern scientists and Social-Engineers are in some ways like O'Brien. They feel that the advance of science and human progress is their purpose and greatest achievement. Or even better Tomakin in the book: Brave New World. He leads a group of students on a tour, introduces them to the techniques of fertilization and segregation into classes. Be careful what propaganda and social condition can do, before you know it you will be a party member. I see this today with the - far left of the Democrat party. They have an infatuation with science, social dilemmas, race relations, women's rights, and gay liberation.
In Ted Kaczynski's Manifesto: Industrial Society and Its Future he explains the dilemma of modern scientists as follows:
"Science and technology provide the most important examples of surrogate activities (refer to par. 38-44). Some scientists claim that they are motivated by "curiosity" or by a desire to "benefit humanity." But it is easy to see that neither of these can be the principal motive of most scientists. As for "curiosity," that notion is simply absurd. Most scientists work on highly specialized problems that are not the object of any normal curiosity. For example, is an astronomer, a mathematician or an entomologist curious about the properties of isopropyltrimethylmethane? Of course not. Only a chemist is curious about such a thing, and he is curious about it only because chemistry is his surrogate activity. Is the chemist curious about the appropriate classification of a new species of beetle? No. That question is of interest only to the entomologist, and he is interested in it only because entomology is his surrogate activity. If the chemist and the entomologist had to exert themselves seriously to obtain the physical necessities, and if that effort exercised their abilities in an interesting way but in some nonscientific pursuit, then they wouldn't give a damn about isopropyltrimethylmethane or the classification of beetles. Suppose that lack of funds for postgraduate education had led the chemist to become an insurance broker instead of a chemist. In that case he would have been very interested in insurance matters but would have cared nothing about isopropyltrimethylmethane. In any case it is not normal to put into the satisfaction of mere curiosity the amount of time and effort that scientists put into their work. The "curiosity" explanation for the scientists' motive just doesn't stand up. The "benefit of humanity" explanation doesn't work any better. Some scientific work has no conceivable relation to the welfare of the human races most of archaeology or comparative linguistics for example. Some other areas of science present obviously dangerous possibilities. Yet scientists in these areas are just as enthusiastic about their work as those who develop vaccines or study air pollution. Consider the case of Dr. Edward Teller, who had an obvious emotional involvement in promoting nuclear power plants. Did this involvement stem from a desire to benefit humanity? If so, then why didn't Dr. Teller get emotional about other "humanitarian" causes? If he was such a humanitarian, then why did he help to develop the H-bomb? As with many other scientific achievements, it is very much open to question whether nuclear power plants actually do benefit humanity. Does the cheap electricity outweigh the accumulating waste and the risk of accidents? Dr. Teller saw only one side of the question. Clearly his emotional involvement with nuclear power arose not from a desire to "benefit humanity" but from a personal fulfillment he got from his work and from seeing it put to practical use. The same is true of scientists generally. With possible rare exceptions, their motive is neither curiosity nor a desire to benefit humanity but the need to go through the power process: to have a goal (a scientific problem to solve), to make an effort (research) and to attain the goal (solution of the problem.) Science is a surrogate activity because scientists work mainly for the fulfillment, they get out of the work itself. Of course, it's not that simple. Other motives do play a role for many scientists. Money and status for example. Some scientists may be persons of the type who have an insatiable drive for status (see paragraph 79), and this may provide much of the motivation for their work. No doubt the majority of scientists, like the majority of the general population, are more or less susceptible to advertising and marketing techniques and need money to satisfy their craving for goods and services. Thus, science is not a PURE surrogate activity. But it is in large part a surrogate activity. Also, science and technology constitute a power mass movement, and many scientists gratify their need for power through identification with this mass movement (see paragraph 83). Thus, science marches on blindly, without regard to the real welfare of the human race or to any other standard, obedient only to the psychological needs of the scientists and of the government officials and corporation executives who provide the funds for research." par. 87- 92)
Ted Kaczynski is an intellectual. An IQ of 170+. At the age of 16, he enrolled at Harvard, he was a math prodigy. The interesting thing is his distain and hatred for the intellectual. Like I stated in the Introduction. What if intellectual progress and the ascent of society into a utopian-golden age, was not a good thing or even the right thing? When I first read ISAIF, I was perplexed, intrigued and eventually a deeper level of "Red Pilled" occurred. He comes to the conclusion that - technological progress is not good for mankind. Look at the Industrial Revolution, Nuclear-Warheads, Toxic-Waste, Mass-Surveillance, Artificial-Intelligence and worst of all Genetic Manipulation or Therapy. Ted was right in many ways, but killing people was not the answer. He wanted to start a revolution to overthrow the current state of technological progress. He knew that if he raised the questions and wrote a paper or book, he would not get the attention of the mass of people required to begin the transition to the pre-industrial age. He makes the point of how - humans in our current state have enormous mental issues due to the fact of the loss of the "Power-Process" par. 33-37) Doctors mask our mental problems with pills, as well as using social-engineering tactics to lessen the effect of depression, anxiety, ADHD, Bi-polar etc. He wrote this Manifesto in the 70's-90's, with that in mind look at our current societal problems. The progress is startling. In hindsight he was right...
The Mid to Late 2000's saw the rise of Smartphones. Everybody who could afford it had a personal CPU in their pocket. Couple this with faster internet and wi-fi, everybody had the worlds information at their fingertips. This was the outpouring of the information age. The experts and intellectual multiplied. Experts are now your neighbor, co-worker, trash man and butcher. We can at any giving time ask Google AI anything or search anything in matter of seconds. So how do the modern experts and elite intellectuals differentiate between us, remember what Hoffer said:
"...the intellectual has not known how to retain a position of leadership in the movements and new regimes he has done so much to initiate and promote. He has usually been elbowed out by fanatics and practical men of action..."
Over the last century TPTB have hidden their mission and goals of global conquest in the formation of non-profit foundations i.e., Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation. The major player in this global conquest since 2010 is the World Economic Forum. Go to their website and watch this video, then ask yourself, who made TPTB rulers over me?
During Trump's historical exit from the Presidency, we began to see the largest propaganda campaign in American history, only to rival 9/11. We witnessed the experts and intellectual journalist unleashed from the tables of their overseers. Like rabid wolves on the hunt to attack anything that resembles opposition to the narrative. Quick on the draw and never relenting - News Fact checkers, seem to gather their evidence at unfathomable speeds. The most atrocious attack on truth and free speech is the censoring of social media post and the shadow banning of tweets. Next will be the complete cancelation of an Indvidual's cyber persona, very Maoist or Stalin. The STASI of East Berlin would be amazed at this magic. Arthur C. Clarke said:
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
So here we are after two years of lockdowns, mask mandates and threats of a coerced experimental vaccine. Experts will soon want to replace our - Supreme Court with health and technological experts or eventually a artificial intelligence hive mind. Will we see what's on the horizon, and rise to resist before it's too late? I hope so, I hope so.
Comments
Post a Comment